“Healing begins the moment you stop yelling at imaginary baristas.”
-Coco, post‑therapy
Light the charcoal. Sprinkle the sage. Protect your peace. Secure the breakables. Hide the good throw pillows. Coco, our household’s Agent of Justice, One Scenario People‑Pleaser Emeritus, and Emotional Support Janitor, has discovered that Starbucks offers pup cups but not kitty cups. And she is not taking it well.
She is pacing the kitchen like she’s about to filibuster the entire household. She’s muttering about “traditional values,” “the decline of American respect for felines,” and “the liberal agenda of canine favoritism.” I’m standing there holding my coffee like a hostage. And wondering if I need to call her therapist? And should I ask if she offers emergency anger‑release sessions for cats who feel politically marginalized by dairy foam.

Coco: “I just think it’s real interesting that Starbucks can say “pup cup” but not “kitty cup.” What about the cats? What about the taxpaying cats?”
Me: “Coco, you don’t pay taxes.”
Coco: “I pay in emotional labor.”
Piper (dramatically entering like she’s auditioning for a reality show): “Oh my God, Coco, not this again. Just take the whipped cream and go.”
Coco: “It’s about principle!”
Tinkerbell (adjusting her glasses, sipping imaginary tea): “Statistically speaking, Coco, you are experiencing a disproportionate emotional response to a dairy‑based product.”
Coco: “I am experiencing oppression!”
Me: “Okay. I’m calling our therapist.”
This is a dramatic reenactment. Because the therapist said it was okay to use this for “creative processing.”
Therapist: “So, Coco, tell me what brings you in today?”
Coco: “The system.”
Therapist: “Okay. Can you be more specific?”
Coco: “Starbucks. They hate cats. They hate me personally. I am being targeted!”
Therapist: “Let’s try grounding. Can you name three things you see?”
Coco: “Injustice. Discrimination. And a lack of feline‑centered branding.”
Therapist: “Alright. Let’s try a different approach. I’m going to bring in a pretend Starbucks employee. You may direct your feelings toward them.”
Me (whispering): “Oh this is gonna be good.”
Therapist (gesturing to an empty chair): “Coco, this is “Brad.” Brad works at Starbucks. Brad is here to listen.”
Coco (eyes narrowing like Clint Eastwood in a showdown): “Brad, Why No Kitty Cups?”
Therapist: “Good, Coco. Use your words.”
Coco: “Brad, you listen to me. I am a consumer. I am a woman of culture. I am a cat of the people. And you will put some respect on my name.”
Therapist: “Excellent. Now tell Brad how this made you feel.”
Coco: “Like a second‑class citizen in my own country.”

Therapist: “Coco, remember. Brad is just a pretend Starbucks employee. He’s here so you can safely express your feelings.”
Coco (vibrating with righteous indignation): “I am expressing them!”
Me: “Coco, breathe. Use your coping skills.”
Coco: “My coping skill is justice!”
And before anyone can intervene, Coco launches herself across the therapy room like a voluptuous, furious Republican senator storming a school board meeting. She lands squarely on Fake Brad’s empty chair and gives it one decisive, symbolic chomp. It was not harmful. Not violent. It was just the kind of dramatic gesture that says, “This is what happens when you disrespect cats.”
Therapist (scribbling notes like their license depends on it): “Okay! Okay. That was a big feeling. Let’s label that. That was anger.”
Tinkerbell: “Technically, that was a behavioral outburst.”
Piper: “Technically, that was iconic.”
Me: “Technically, that was assault on a piece of furniture. But we’ll unpack that later.”
Therapist: “Coco, can we try using our words instead of our teeth?”
Therapist: “Beautiful. Now, Coco, I want you to imagine Brad apologizing.”
Coco: “Good. He should.”
Coco (still perched on the chair like a victorious war general): “BRING ME MY KITTY CUP.”
Therapist: “And now imagine Brad offering you a kitty cup.”
Coco (softening): “With extra foam?”
Therapist: “Yes, Coco. With extra foam.”
Coco (sniffling): “Okay. I can heal.”
Coco left therapy feeling spiritually renewed. Emotionally validated. And ready to re‑enter society without threatening to boycott Starbucks on Facebook like a suburban aunt with too much time and too many opinions. She still wants kitty cups. She still believes she’s a political prisoner of dairy injustice. But she’s calmer. And Brad. Imaginary though he may be. Has learned his lesson. That’s on emotional regulation, feline edition.
And now because our home is built on equality, justice, and the feline constitution. I must fix each of them a kitty cup every single day. So, no one feels oppressed by dairy‑based nomenclature ever again. Thanks for reading! And boycott pup cups until they become kitty cups. Do you treat your animals to those tasty little whipped cream filled cups?
Affirmation: I release what is not mine. Reclaim what is. And refuse to let dairy foam define my worth.
***Don’t forget to watch the video!***
#ThisPuzzledLife
